A short history of Rio Tinto Mining abuses
J July, 2007 · 1 Comment
Categories: Active investigations · Corperate power · Corruption
Archives
Contributions and membership
We depend on contributions from the public. You can donate a small or a big sum. Our banknumber is: 03 1563 0053952 00 Westpac Trust Bank Raglan You can also become a member. Please click the link to our website and download the membership formAbout Kasm
Consequences of seabed mining
General information
Links
Mining companies
News
Political
Scientific rapports and research
Vera
a
-
Recent Posts
- Rio Tinto soars after rejecting $142bn BHP approach
- BURSON-MARSTELLER: PR FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER
- Titanium or Water? Trouble brews in Southern India
- Iron Mountain, BHP, Fortescue Rise; Iron Ore Price to Soar 50% in 2008
- The selling off of Canada
- BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto Acquisitions Depend on Metals Prices, Demand
- Rio Tinto says receives approval to buy Alcan
- Rob Zaleski: Anti-mining activist Churchill writes last warning
- Rio Tinto More Appealing Than BHP Billiton, Fortescue
- the international association of business and parliament
-
Recent Comments
mcnatty on A short history of Rio Tinto M… mcnatty on Our new blog margarets on Our new blog
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Cutline by Chris Pearson.
1 response so far ↓
mcnatty // J July, 2007 at 7:38 am
A stronger indictment comes from within the Riotinto organisation.
A selected quote from an audit of selected sites
During our site visits ERM found four operations in Australia where the level of identification and protection of indigenous archaeological artefacts could have been improved, and unauthorised land clearing highlighted deficiencies in management controls. While the incidents had been notified to corporate, these deficiencies represent a potential business risk to Rio Tinto as continued good performance at local level is crucial to securing access to new and existing mineral rights.
You must be logged in to post a comment.